Reasonable Person (Legally) | MELS LAWS a Legal Buffet
Common Law Concept of Negligence:
Reasonable care – is based on a hypothetical person and not the defendant.
Reasonable care – is based on a hypothetical person and not the defendant.
The legal test is an objective
test on how a reasonable person would act. A reasonable person would take
precautions against foreseeable risk but not against every every conceivable
danger. A reasonalble person considers the likelyhood of harm and the severity of any consequences. A reasonalble person would also adopt affordable precautions to prevent against mishap, accident
or injury. Undergo cost-benefit analysis that they would apply.
If the person is
an Engineer, Lawyer, Dr or other professional then the reasobale
care standard is not applied but a higher standard would apply. A professional
is reasonably competent and experienced, whatever level of experience. So even
if a person puts themselves forth as being professional or trained in a
particular field then they are to be held to the standard of a reasonably
competent and experienced Dr or Lawyer etc, but f they have further expertise
or specialism then they are held to an even higher standard. If a person is
fresh out of law school or recently qualified in a particular field they are
still held to the high standard but not as high as a specialist.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.